|
Categories
|
|
|
|
|
Put Your Commands On A Diet
By
John R. Falk
|
|
Can a dog understand our
language? If so, how much of it? The question poses
possibly as many answers as there are dogs. Certainly the
boundaries of a canine's lexicon vary, according to his
age, environment, training and inborn intelligence.
The average house dog is thought to develop a functional
vocabulary of close to a dozen-and-a-half different words
by the time he reaches five to six years of age.
Additional phrases containing up to three key words can
boost this total to a potential of about thirty.
While impressive, such a hefty vocabulary brings little to
the average dog's trainability. In fact, the more the
dog's vocabulary can be pruned, the better. Contradictory?
Hardly. Our spoken words, though meaningful to us, are
simply sounds to the dog. Heard initially, they express
about as much to him as gobbledygook would to us. Only by
demonstration and constant repetition can he be made to
understand how each word applies to him, in terms of
expected behavior response.
Some canine behaviorists compare that process to how a
child learns. To a limited extent, the similarity may hold
true. Still, there is scant valid basis for real
comparison. True, a parent commonly uses phrases and often
whole sentences to convey ideas and meaning to a baby.
Yet, besides the meaning of words, the infant must also
learn the more complicated process of mimicking their
sounds for eventual speech. For the child then, speech
sound patterns, to be imitated, swiftly vie in importance
with word meanings. The dog, however, has neither the
human intelligence level nor our need or ability to speak.
It follows, then, that phrases and full sentences serve no
purpose in enhancing the dog's training. They should in
fact, be considered excess baggage. Really, in the early
and middle stages of his education, they tend only to
create confusion and dilute his ability to absorb training
Unfortunately, too many new owners tend to muddle up their
dog's tutoring with surplus verbiage. It's human nature
for us to speak in whole sentences, but “Come on now,
King, big fella, be a good boy and come right in here now
when I call you,” can't possibly pass muster as a good
command to teach a young dog to come to you. Bet you can't
repeat that “command” from memory. So, how can you
expect a dog to respond to something you can't even
remember yourself? Then, when he fails to comply or reacts
erratically, the “command” often gets a few angry
words added to it, further compounding the poor animal's
bewilderment and slowing the learning process..
It's not impossible to train a dog using such excessively
wordy commands. After all, most dogs are amazingly
adaptable. Sooner or later, they will catch on to what's
wanted. But, your goal should be to speed the pace of
training using the simplest, most direct orders to teach
the young dog what's expected
of him.
This means using the basic commands so important to all
his future training. These are: his name, "No,"
"Here," "Sit," "Stay" and
"Kennel." Equipped with this fundamental lexicon
alone, any pup can become acceptably "civilized"
in a matter of four or five weeks.
Choose a short, crisp, distinctive name for your dog that
sounds nothing like any of the commands to be used now or
later. It serves a two-fold purpose: 1) to give the pup
identity, and 2) to get his attention to receive further
orders.
“No," is the most direct and practical negative; it
interchanges effectively for several otherwise superfluous
commands such as "Shame on You,"
"Quiet," "Get Down," "Bad
Dog." "Dirty" (for housebreaking errors).
"Here," of course, is the terse call in order
that tells the pup to come to you. It is obviously more
concise and effectual than "Come on in to me,
now" or "Get in here, right now" and helps
to avoid confusion.
"Sit" and/or "Stay" are the crisp
directives that set up both the owner's authority and grab
the pup's attention. Actually, the “Sit” command
should also mean for the dog to “Stay,” until released
with “OK,” or “Alright.”
"Kennel," is a short, business-like order that
encompasses a variety of meanings and eliminates the need
for additional commands. For the dog it means “Get in
the house,” "Get in your bed," "Get in
your kennel run," "Get in your doghouse,"
"Get in the car," or "Get in the crate in
the car," depending on the circumstances of the
moment. Obviously, such single-word commands are much more
effective and time-saving than all of the above-mentioned
separate ones Thus, his vocabulary has been slimmed, but
not his understanding of, or obedience to, your various
orders.
His later training will expand his vocabulary with the new
directives of "Heel," "Wait" and
"Down." Since you've used "No" to stop
your dog's various unwanted acts, such as jumping up on
people, the word "Down" can now specify only one
thing to the dog: lie down.
Eventually, he can be taught still more commands, such as
“Off,” to tell to get off the furniture or your bed.
Always keep in mind that these should be selected on the
basis of crispness, simplicity and whenever possible,
pertinence to a variety of situations.
The use of the fewest and shortest commands possible
cannot fail to make your job of training and the dog's job
of learning much faster and easier. There's just no sense
in overloading his vocabulary. Keep it and his body lean
and you'll raise an alert, responsive, well-behaved,
healthy dog…a pooch you can be proud to own.
|
About
The Author
John
R. Falk has authored many magazine
articles and four books on dogs. He is the
webmaster of his own website: http://www.dogs4ever.com
where current and prospective dog owners
can find a varied menu of interesting,
informative items on our best pals. |
|
|
|
<< Back to the Article Index
©
Copyright 2005, ArticleJunction.com
|
|
|