|
Is really not as important as
to how you invest in the stock market. And how you invest
in the stock market should take into consideration what
goals you are setting for that stock market investment.
For example, are you investing for capital appreciation or
for income through dividend paying stocks? Or is the
investment in the stock market for the combination of both
capital appreciation and dividend income? Are you
investing through a Mutual fund(s) or selecting your own
individual stocks?
Do you invest with a
lump-sum dollar amount or dollar-cost average into your
stock or Mutual fund positions (buying the same stock or
Mutual fund at different prices over the years)? Is your
investment dollar spread too thin and are all of those
dollars working for your ROI (return on investment)? Do
you pay commission fees to purchase a stock? Do you pay
load fees in your Mutual fund(s)? How much does your
Mutual fund(s) charge you for management, operating and
marketing fees (they are called ‘hidden fees’)? (One
Mutual fund, just recently, was fined 450 million for
‘hidden fees’ practices.) ‘How’ you invest in the
stock market is more important than ‘when’ you invest
in the stock market and ‘how’ you invest will
determine your ROI.
When you invest in the
stock market is after you devise a how-to plan that takes
into consideration all of the factors above. Quite
frankly, every cent of your investor dollar should benefit
you and your family and no one else.
There is an enormous amount
of investor dollars supporting some whopper salaries on
Wall Street. Just recently (the summer of 2003), Richard
Grasso, the once former head (CEO) of the New York stock
exchange was forced to resign, after his salary for the
past 2 years were made public. His salary - 12 million a
year for the past 2 years, a check for 48 million, which
his advisor suggested he return (which he did) and a
pay-package of 139.5 million dollars (which he hasn’t
returned, as of this writing-mid-2004). Now, that is just
one man’s salary on Wall Street and it is certainly good
work if you can get it! Where did all this money for his
salary come from? If the money didn’t come from
investor’s dollars, why were Pension fund managers so
outraged by Grasso’s salary that they threatened to pull
billions of Pension fund dollars from the New York stock
exchange? I really don’t know where the money came from
to pay his salary. What I do know is the one place where
the mo!
ney for his salary didn’t
come from and that is from the Stockopoly investor. Not
one cent!
It is my opinion that all
stock purchases should be made without commission charges
(which is possible). The investment in all stocks should
be a long-term investment, and that every stock purchased
should have a history of raising their dividend every
year. And all dividends should be reinvested back into the
company’s shares (also commission free), until
retirement. Every cent you invest should work for your
ROI. By purchasing those companies that have a long-term
history of raising their dividend each year (for example,
Comerica – 34 years, Proctor and Gamble – 47 years,
BB&T – 31 years, GE – 28 years, Atmos Energy - 16
years (they also provide a 3% discount on all shares
purchased through dividend reinvestments), the ‘HOW’
you invest becomes automatic- you dollar-cost average into
your holdings through the dividends provided by the
companies every quarter.
The dividend is the one
factor a company cannot ‘fudge’. The money has to be
there to pay the shareholder. If a company can raise their
dividend every year, the company MUST be doing something
right! When a company has a long history of raising their
dividend every year you in a sense eliminate risk, since a
lower stock price for that company just means a higher
dividend yield. If, for example, a stock purchased at
$50.00 a share drops to $36.00 a share, the income
provided by the dividend income accelerates, and your
dividend reinvestment provides you a better dividend
‘bang for your buck’. There have been many up and
downs in the stock market these past 47 years (I know,
I’ve been in almost 40 of them) – yet Proctor and
Gamble has never failed to raise their dividend during
those past 47 years.
Below is an example of two
types of investors that have $10,000 to invest in the
stock market. One is a lump-sum investor, the other a
dollar-cost averaging investor. One investor doesn’t
care about dividends, the dollar-cost averaging investor
does. Each investor took a different ‘HOW’ to invest
and both investors had the same ‘WHEN’ when they
invested. Let’s say they invested at the same time, each
stock purchased at $50 dollars a share and every quarter
the stock dropped $2.00 a share, till the stocks hit a
bottom of $36.00, and then recovers back to $50.00. The
lump-sum investor bought the fictitious company ABC, which
does not pay a dividend, and the dollar-cost averaging
investor purchased the fictitious company XYZ, which pays
a quarterly dividend of 50 cents a share (a 4.0% yearly
dividend yield), and the company had a history of raising
their dividend every March for the past 41 consecutive
years. Both purchases were made in January.
The lump sum investor
bought 200 shares of ABC at $50.00 a share, watched the
stock drop to $36.00, then recover back to $50.00 and when
all was said and done ended up right where he started with
200 shares of ABC worth $10,000.
The dollar-cost averaging
investor purchased 100 shares of XYZ in January for
$5,000.00, (the stock paying a quarterly 50 cent a share
dividend for a 4.0 percent yearly dividend yield), and
purchased $1,000.00 worth of more shares every quarter for
the next 5 quarters. Each quarter the dividend from the
company was also reinvested into more shares of stock.
Each March the company raised its dividend 2 cents a
share, marking 45 consecutive years of rising dividends.
All purchases were commission free.
January, 100 shares of XYZ
@ 50.00 a share = $5,000
Share $1,000.00
Stock price Dividend Purchases Share Purchases
March $48.00 (52 cents a share) 1.083 20.83 shares
June $46.00 (52 cents a share) 1.378 21.74 shares
Sept. $44.00 (52 cents a share) 1.714 22.72 shares
Dec. $42.00 (52 cents a share) 2.098 23.81 shares
March $40.00 (54 cents a share) 2.637 25.00 shares
June $38.00 (54 cents a share) 3.169 - 0 -
Sept. $36.00 (54 cents a share) 3.393 - 0 -
Dec. $38.00 (54 cents a share) 3.262 - 0 -
March $40.00 (56 cents a share) 3.260 - 0 -
June $42.00 (56 cents a share) 3.149 - 0 -
Sept. $44.00 (56 cents a share) 3.045 - 0 -
Dec. $48.00 (56 cents a share) 2.827 - 0 -
March $50.00 (58 cents a share) 2.843 - 0 –
The dollar-cost averaging
investor now owns 247.953 shares of XYZ. The value at
$50.00 a share = $12,397.65.
So, the lump-sum investor
ends up right where he started, 200 shares of ABC worth
$10,000, and the dollar-cost averaging invested ends up
owning 247.953 shares of XYZ worth $12,397.65, along with
the dividend income generated from owning those shares.
Both had the same ‘when’ when they invested.
The dividend yield at 58
cents a quarter (.58 divided by $50.00 x 4 x 100 =), a
4.64% yearly dividend yield. Every quarter every dividend
received from the company was higher than the previous
dividend, no matter what the stock price was at the end of
the quarter. The dollar-cost averaging investor is
receiving a dividend for the next quarter from XYZ (no
matter what the stock price happens to be) of .58 X
247.953 shares = $143.81, and the next quarter (and every
quarter thereafter) the dividend would be even higher if
the company, at least, maintained their dividend. If XYZ
repeated the same performance history ($50.00 down to
$36.00, back up to $50.00) for the next 3 years, and ABC
did the same- the HOW you invest in the stock market makes
all the difference in the world.
In the Stockopoly plan
there are no commission charges, all stocks are purchased
commission free. There is no need for a stockbroker (the
tools needed for doing your own research are easily
available and the where and how-to’s are included in the
book); there are no hidden fees, load fees, operating, and
management or advertising fees. There are no illegal
trading practices, costing investors tens of million of
dollars. (And the Wall Street Christmas bonuses will not
be coming out of your pocket.) Every cent works for you in
the form of increasing cash dividends every week, month
and year. You’ll never pay too much for a stock, even if
that stock is at a 52 week high. The WHEN you invest in
the stock market is of little importance compared to
knowing HOW to invest in the stock market, simply because
the how over rules the when.
In the Stockopoly plan you
will discover HOW to use all the tools necessary to
develop a concrete, definite plan of investing that will
profit you and your family for the rest of your lives.
For more information and
excerpts from The Stockopoly Plan, please visit www.thestockopolyplan.com
You have permission to this
article either electronically or in print as long as the
author bylines are included, with a live link, and the
article is not changed in any way. Please provide a
courtesy e-mail to: charles@thestockopolyplan.com
telling where the article was published. Thanks!
|
About
The Author
Charles
M. O’Melia is an individual investor
with almost 40 years of experience and
passion for the stock market. Author of
the book ‘The Stockopoly Plan’, soon
to be released by American Book
Publishing.
chasmo99@yahoo.com |
|
|