|
Data loss is an expensive
reality. It's a hard fact that it happens more often then
users like to admit. A recent study by the accounting firm
McGladrey and Pullen estimates that one out of every 500
data centers will experience a severe computer disaster
this year. As a result, almost half of those companies
will go out of business. At the very least, a data loss
disaster can mean lost income and missed business
opportunities.
The other side of data loss
is the psychological and emotional turmoil it can cause to
IT managers and business owners. Despair, panic, and the
knowledge that the whole organization might be at risk are
involved. In a sense, that's only fair, since human error
is one of the two largest contributing factors in data
loss. Together with mechanical failure, it accounts for
almost 75 per cent of all incidents. (Software corruption,
computer viruses and physical disasters such as fire and
water damage make up the rest.)
Disk drives today are
typically reliable. Human beings, it turns out, are not. A
Strategic Research Corp. study done in 2000 found that
approximately 15 per cent of all unplanned downtime
occurred due to human error. A significant proportion of
that happened because users failed to implement adequate
backup procedures, either having trouble with their
backups, or having no backup at all.
How does it happen that
skilled, high-level users put their systems - and their
businesses - at such risk?
In many cases, the problem
starts long before the precipitating system error is made,
that is, when users place their faith in out-of-box
solutions that may not, in fact, fit their organization's
needs. Instead of assessing their business and technology
requirements, then going to an appropriate engineered
solution, even experienced IT professionals at large
corporations will often simply buy what they're sold. In
this case, faith in technology can be an vice instead of a
virtue.
But human intervention
itself can sometimes be the straw that breaks the
technology's back. When the office of a Venezuelan civil
engineering firm was devastated by floods, its owners sent
17 soaked, mud-coated disks from three RAID arrays to us
in plastic bags. A tough enough salvage job was made even
more complex by the fact that someone had frozen the
drives before shipping them. As the disks thawed, yet more
damage was done. (After eight weeks of painstaking
directory-by-directory recovery, all the data from the
remaining fifteen disks was retrieved.)
Sometimes, the underlying
cause of a data loss event is simply shoddy housekeeping.
The more arduous the required backup routine, the less
likely it will be done on a regular basis. A state
ambulance monitoring system suffered a serious disk
failure, only to discover that its automated backup hadn't
run for fourteen months. A tape had jammed in the drive,
but no-one had noticed.
When disaster strikes, the
normal human reaction is panic. Because the loss of data
signifies critical consequences, even the most competent
IT staff can jump to conclusions, and take inappropriate
action. A blank screen at a critical time can lead to a
series of naive decisions, each one compounding the
preceding error. Wrong buttons get pushed, and the
disaster only gets worse. Sometimes the pressure to
correct the system failure speedily can result in an
attempt to reconfigure an entire RAID array. IT
specialists are typically not equipped to deal with crisis
modes or data recovery techniques. Just as a good
physician is trained to prolong life, the skilled IT
specialist is trained to keep the system running. When a
patient dies, the physician turns to others, such as
nurses or counselors to manage the situation. When
significant data loss occurs, the IT specialist turns to
the data recovery professional.
Data recovery specialists
are innovative problem solvers. Often, the application of
basic common sense, when no-one else is in any condition
to apply it, is the beginning of the journey towards data
recovery. The data recovery specialist draws on a wealth
of experience, married to a "never say die"
attitude, and a comprehensive tool kit of problem-solving
procedures. Successful recovery outcomes hinge on a
combination of innovative logistics, applied
problem-solving, and "technology triage," the
process of stabilizing an affected system quickly,
analyzing and treating its wounds, and preparing it for
surgery. The triage process sets priorities, such as
targeting which files are needed first or which are
absolutely vital to the functioning of the business, and
establishes whether files might be recovered in less
structured formats (such as text-only), which may be
desirable when time is crucial.
The art and science of
professional data recovery can spell the difference
between a business' success or its failure. Before that
level of intervention is required, though, users can take
steps to ensure that the probability of a data loss
disaster is minimized.
Basic to any business
technology plan is a regular fire-drill procedure. Back-up
routines may be in place, staff may assigned to specific
roles, hardware and software may be configured - but, if
the user isn't completely sure that everything works the
way it should, a data loss event is inevitable. Having
adequate, tested, and current backups in place is
critical. A hardware breakdown should not be compounded by
human error - if the malfunctioning drive is critical, the
task of dealing with it should go to a data recovery
professional.
Just as data loss disasters
are rooted in a combination of mechanical failure and
human error, so, too, the data recovery solution lies in a
creative marriage of the technological and the human. The
underlying philosophy of successful data recovery is that
technology is something to be used by human beings, not
something that uses us.
|
About
The Author
Name:
Darryl Peddle
Company: CBL Technologies, Canada
Author description: Darryl Peddle is an
Internet Marketing Specialist with CBL
Technologies, one of the largest data
recovery specialists in the world.
Website: http://www.cbltech.com |
|
|